Home Print this page Email this page
Users Online: 334
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 8-11

Standard setting in objective structured clinical examination: Assigning a pass/fail cut score


1 Department of Training and Supervision, Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2 Medical Intern, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Oncology, National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Abdullah Alnemari
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/2468-6360.198803

Rights and Permissions

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has been considered a standard assessment method since its introduction; and as with every assessment tool, OSCE has its advantages and disadvantages. To have OSCE as a reliable method to evaluate examinees, its standards must be set according to certain criteria. Standard setting is one of the methods developed to set the expected pass or fail cut score in an OSCE station. This review article is based on multiple studies that have been proposed to evaluate the reliability and validity of OSCE. There is no single method that is considered best for all testing situations. The choice of a method will depend on what kind of judgements you can get and how much the experience they have in the standing method. All methods of standard setting mentioned are required for judgement. All the standard methods were considered subjective methods. Yet once a standard method has been set, the decisions based on that method can be made objectively. Instead of a separate set of judgements for each applicant, we would get the same set of judgements applied to all applicants. Standards cannot be objectively determined, but they can be objectively applied.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1970    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded191    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal